| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Manuel Schneider
Guest
|
 Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 4:49 pm Post subject: Re-reading configuration / including files |
 |
|
I'm not sure if I should post this as a feature request:
Is there a possibility of letting icecast re-reading its configuration, say something like sending a HUP signal?
Another thing: Includes of additional files into the configuration would be useful. Eg. to divide the configuration in a global server part and a mountpoint (or per-mountpoint) part. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
epe
Asesor espaņol
Joined: 27 Aug 2005
Posts: 132
Location: Quito - Ecuador
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2005 3:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, by sending an HUP icecast will reread the configuration and therefore capture the changes you have made (passwords, new mountpoints, etc)
regards
ernesto
_________________
--
http://www.NuestroServer.com
USA: +1 305 359 4495, Espaņa: +34 911 877 602
Ecuador: +593 2 600 4454
Se habla espaņol |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MikeS
Code Warrior
Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 73
Location: Barcelona, Spain
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 1:08 am Post subject: Re: Re-reading configuration / including files |
|
|
| Manuel Schneider wrote: |
I'm not sure if I should post this as a feature request:
Is there a possibility of letting icecast re-reading its configuration, say something like sending a HUP signal?
Another thing: Includes of additional files into the configuration would be useful. Eg. to divide the configuration in a global server part and a mountpoint (or per-mountpoint) part. |
Icecast does this already, just send it a SIGHUP.
Multiple files for the config can be done easily - the config is an XML file, so standard XML entity inclusion can be done (I haven't actually tried it, but there's no reason it shouldn't work).
Mike |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Manuel Schneider
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 8:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks you two for telling me the thing with -s HUP. That's great!
Concerning the entity inclusion, how does this work?
Is it the "old way" by putting an <link href="..."> into the source file? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
