View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
newb0rn
Joined: 04 Feb 2009 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:42 am Post subject: refbuf/refbuf_release next not nul |
|
|
Hi Karl,
Im running KH8 and getting the following practically filling my error.log file. All my streams seem to be operating normally though. This doesnt rule out something though I may have installed recently. But I have no idea what this is trying to tell me.. perhaps something to do with buffer?
[2009-02-04 01:34:22] DBUG refbuf/refbuf_release next not null
[2009-02-04 01:34:22] DBUG refbuf/refbuf_release next not null
[2009-02-04 01:34:22] DBUG refbuf/refbuf_release next not null
[2009-02-04 01:34:22] DBUG refbuf/refbuf_release next not null
[2009-02-04 01:34:22] DBUG refbuf/refbuf_release next not null
[2009-02-04 01:34:22] DBUG refbuf/refbuf_release next not null
[2009-02-04 01:34:22] DBUG refbuf/refbuf_release next not null
[2009-02-04 01:34:22] DBUG refbuf/refbuf_release next not null
[2009-02-04 01:34:22] DBUG refbuf/refbuf_release next not null
[2009-02-04 01:34:23] DBUG stats/process_global_event update node on global "stream_kbytes_sent" (8513216)
[2009-02-04 01:34:23] DBUG stats/process_global_event update node on global "stream_kbytes_read" (9013705)
[2009-02-04 01:34:23] DBUG refbuf/refbuf_release next not null
[2009-02-04 01:34:23] DBUG refbuf/refbuf_release next not null
[2009-02-04 01:34:23] DBUG refbuf/refbuf_release next not null
[2009-02-04 01:34:23] DBUG stats/process_global_event update node on global "stream_kbytes_sent" (8513216)
[2009-02-04 01:34:23] DBUG stats/process_global_event update node on global "stream_kbytes_read" (9013783)
[2009-02-04 01:34:23] DBUG refbuf/refbuf_release next not null
[2009-02-04 01:34:23] DBUG refbuf/refbuf_release next not null
[2009-02-04 01:34:23] DBUG refbuf/refbuf_release next not null
[2009-02-04 01:34:23] DBUG refbuf/refbuf_release next not null
[2009-02-04 01:34:23] DBUG refbuf/refbuf_release next not null
[2009-02-04 01:34:23] DBUG refbuf/refbuf_release next not null
[2009-02-04 01:34:23] DBUG refbuf/refbuf_release next not null
[2009-02-04 01:34:23] DBUG refbuf/refbuf_release next not null
[2009-02-04 01:34:23] DBUG refbuf/refbuf_release next not null
[2009-02-04 01:34:23] DBUG refbuf/refbuf_release next not null
[2009-02-04 01:34:23] DBUG refbuf/refbuf_release next not null
[2009-02-04 01:34:23] DBUG refbuf/refbuf_release next not null
[2009-02-04 01:34:23] DBUG refbuf/refbuf_release next not null
[2009-02-04 01:34:23] DBUG refbuf/refbuf_release next not null
[2009-02-04 01:34:23] DBUG refbuf/refbuf_release next not null
Thanks,
Stu |
|
Back to top |
|
|
karlH Code Warrior
Joined: 13 Jun 2005 Posts: 5476 Location: UK
|
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
no, it looks to be some left over debug. If you lower the loglevel then you won't get the flood. It will be gone when I do the next update. If this is a real problem for people then bug me so I don't forget. The fix if people are interested is
Code: |
--- source.c (revision 15607)
+++ source.c (working copy)
@@ -932,6 +932,7 @@
}
source->stream_data = to_go->next;
source->queue_size -= to_go->len;
+ to_go->next = NULL;
refbuf_release (to_go);
}
}
|
karl |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|