| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
DJManass

Joined: 31 Jan 2010 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:00 pm Post subject: Icecast server with sc_trans.conf auto DJ [Need help] |
|
|
Hello all,
I have launched icecast 2.3.2 server with shoutcast auto dj and the problem is that when auto dj connect its dont show the current song. If dj connect evrything is ok. Maybe anyone have any ideas how to fix it ? Thanks for help =)
Server: Centos 5
Last edited by DJManass on Thu Feb 18, 2010 6:35 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
karlH Code Warrior

Joined: 13 Jun 2005 Posts: 5476 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
are you seeing attempts by the source client to insert metadata in your log files. look for admin.cgi
karl. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DJManass

Joined: 31 Jan 2010 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I checked in icecast folder at playlist.log there is no info that auto dj would try to send what song it playing. And where i can find admin.cgi ? And what to do with it?
Thanks for your quick answer and help and sry that i dont understand ;D
i just tryed to update song title for AUTO DJ evrything work fine ;D just that normal songs its dont show ;/ I think the problem is that maybe Auto DJ dont send information about what song its playing so maybe i need to change something in sc_trans.conf?
Last edited by DJManass on Thu Feb 18, 2010 6:36 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
karlH Code Warrior

Joined: 13 Jun 2005 Posts: 5476 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 9:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the playlist log would only show actual updates not failed updates, check your error log. IIRC one of the shoutcast clients does send really badly formatted headers for metadata updates and that will be rejected by icecast.
karl. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DJManass

Joined: 31 Jan 2010 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 9:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There is no error about /***** stream which is auto DJ
And about badly formatted headers where and how i can fix it 
Last edited by DJManass on Thu Feb 18, 2010 6:36 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
karlH Code Warrior

Joined: 13 Jun 2005 Posts: 5476 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the problem will be shown with
EROR connection/_handle_connection HTTP request parsing failed
a connection that is working will show
INFO admin/admin_handle_request Received admin command admin.cgi on mount "/jpafm"
The headers are from the source client, so it would need to be fixed there, whether there is a working update I can't say and whether anyone from nullsoft/aol is prepared to fix it is another question. I'm not aware of any patch that allowed icecast to accept that particular oddity as generally people used something that worked like ezstream or ices0
karl. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DJManass

Joined: 31 Jan 2010 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 9:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ok thanks for your help we will try do something about that =) Btw others sources can't encode to aac+ ;/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
karlH Code Warrior

Joined: 13 Jun 2005 Posts: 5476 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 11:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That is because of the licensing of aac+.
karl. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DJManass

Joined: 31 Jan 2010 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Maybe this will be off topic but just wondering aac+ 64kbps vs ogg 64kbps which is better  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
karlH Code Warrior

Joined: 13 Jun 2005 Posts: 5476 Location: UK
|
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 12:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You'll get different opinions on that question. Personally I would say vorbis. AAC+ has a cost to it, where as vorbis is free, and based on the last set of low bitrate tests, I tended to find the vorbis one had better quality.
karl |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|